Complexity of the processes of modern urban
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2019-2-32-44
Abstract
The current crisis is primarily related to the economic situation in some countries. An economic aspect of the functioning of national economies, including the problem of the dynamics of gross domestic product, economic growth of quantitative (quantitative) character and economic development, which takes a qualifying (qualitative) character, as well as other indicators that describe the current economic situation have been analyzed in the article. This analysis allows us to determine whether this country is in a phase of growth or development, or in a phase of crisis, which can be understood synthetically as a decrease in production in the economy that lasts longer than two quarters.
The crisis, however, from a different point of view has been analyzed in the research, a completely different matter of the crisis has been presented, and not its economic aspect . Continuous growth or economic development should theoretically сontribute for improving the quality of people’s life. Economic growth in the national economy on a “macro” scale leads to the growth and development of individual households, which in a simplified form can be called an increase in prosperity. The same expectations of society - economic growth should affect the improvement of living conditions of the ordinary citizen. A similar situation should look like during the economic crisis. Times of macroeconomic crisis - the crisis also of the individual household, the need to “tighten the belt.” However, in times of economic prosperity, a person is also forced to function in parallel in a crisis, that affects every major city, regardless of the growth or crisis of the national economy, lack of jobs, production cuts, rising unemployment, etc. Here we are talking about a specific crisis, which reveals itself in the worsening of the quality of the environment of human functioning - the environment in which a person is daily and meets his needs.
About the Authors
P. BartkovyakRussian Federation
Bartkovyak Petr - Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
K. Kshakevich
Russian Federation
Kshakevich Kazimezh - Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
References
1. Bartkowiak P., Koszel M. (2011). The contemporary crisis of the city, Dilemmas of business management in times of crisis, P. Bartkowiak (Ed.), Scientific Society for Organization and Management, Poznan, pp. 14-39.
2. Bourne L.S. (2001), “The urban sprawl debate. Myths realities and hidden agenda”, Plan Canada, vol. 41 (4).
3. Brueckner J.K. (2001), “Urban sprawl: lessons from urban economics”, [w:] Rothenberg Pack J., Gale W. G. (red.) Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, Brookings Institution Press, Filadelfia.
4. Chmielewski J.M. (2001), Theory of urban planning in urban design and planning, Warsaw University of Technology Publishing House, Warsaw.
5. Gwiazdowicz M. (2010), “Crisis of spatial development”, Infos no. 3 (73), Wydaw. Seym for the Sejm Analysis Office, Warsaw.
6. Hall E.T. (2009), The Hidden Dimension, Warszawska Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA S.A., Warsaw.
7. Izdebski H., Nelicki A., Zachariasz I. (2007), Zoning. Polish law on the background of a democratic state ruled by law, The Earnst & Young Program “Sprawne Panstwo”, Warsaw.
8. Jedraszko A. (2005), Spatial development in Poland - roads and off-roads of statutory regulations, Union of Polish Metropolises, Warsaw.
9. Kaminski Z. (2008), “Legal spatial development in Poland”, [in:] Biuletyn Instytutu Geografii Socio-Ekonomiczna i Gospodarki Przestrzennej of the University of A. Mickiewicza in Poznan, Series Regional Development and Regional Policy No. 5, Parysek J. J., Tolle A. (ed.), Selected problems of urban development and revitalization: cognitive and practical aspects, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznan.
10. Kolipinski B. (2011), Expertise on: Spatial order in Poland - status and problems, Publisher of the Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw.
11. Kowalewski A. (2009), “Spatial economy in Poland’, Paper delivered at the SpA Conference of PZiTB on October 6, 2009.
12. Lisowski A. Grochowski M. (2008), “Suburbanization processes. Conditions, forms and consequences", [in:] Expert opinions on the National Spatial Development Concept 2008-2030, ed. KPZK, Ministry of Regional Development, T. 1, Warsaw.
13. Litwinska E. (2008), “The phenomenon of urban sprawl - one of the dimensions of modern urbanization processes", [in:] Slodczyk J., Smigielska M. (ed.), Contemporary directions and dimensions of urbanization processes, Wydaw. University of Opole, Opole.
14. Mierzejewska L., (2010), Sustainable development of the city, Wydaw. Scientific UAM, Poznan.
15. Parysek J.J. (2007), Introduction to spatial management, Wydaw. Scientific UAM, Poznan.
16. Parysek J.J. (2008), “City agglomerations in Poland and problems of their functioning and development", [in:] Biuletyn Instytutu Geografii Socio-Ekonomiczna i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu im. A. Mickiewicza in Poznan, Series Regional Development and Regional Policy No. 5, Selected problems of urban development and revitalization: cognitive and practical aspects, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznan.
17. Parysek J. J., Mierzejewska L. (2009), “Problems of functioning and development of Polish cities from the perspective of 2009" [in:] Bulletin of the Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management of the University of A. Mickiewicza in Poznan, Series Regional Development and Regional Policy No. 6, Selected problems of cities and urban agglomerations at the beginning of the 21st century, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznan.
18. Purchla J. (ed.) (2008), Report on the functioning of the cultural heritage system in Poland after 1989, Report prepared for the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, Wyd. Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, Krakow.
19. Regulski J. (2007), Commentary to the report “Spatial development. Polish law against the standards of a democratic state ruled by law “Earnst & Young Program” Sprawne Panstwo”, Warsaw.
20. Szymanska D., Bieganska J. (2011), “The phenomenon of urbanization and related processes", [in:] Slodczyk J., Smigielska M. (ed.), Urban Studies, T. 4., The processes of urbanization and their determinants at the beginning XXI Century, Wydaw. University of Opole, Opole.
21. Templewicz K. (2011), “Infrastructure of exclusion", [in:] “Krytyka polityczna", no. 27-28, Places of transformation, Wydaw. Krytyki Politycznej / Stowarzyszenie im. Stanislawa Brzozowski, Warsaw.
22. Wassmer R.W. (2002), An economic perspective on urban sprawl: with an application for the North American West, and a test of the efficiency of urban growth boundaries, Sacramento.
23. Weclawowicz G., Banski J., Degorski M., Komornicki T., Korcelli P., Sleszynski P. (2006), Spatial development of Poland at the beginning of the 21st century, Publisher of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
24. Weclawowicz G. (2010), Characteristics of the main trends and changes in the development of urban areas in Poland, Expert opinion commissioned by the Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw.
Review
For citations:
Bartkovyak P., Kshakevich K. Complexity of the processes of modern urban. E-Management. 2019;2(2):32-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2019-2-32-44