Directions of development and regulation of cross-border data flows in international trade

The problem of using cross-border data flows, which are becoming an important factor of production for the sustainable development of modern international trade in goods and services has been analysed. In international exchange, the importance of digital services continues to grow steadily, and as this rises, global data flows are increasing too. The latter, while serving the interests of global digital platforms, can nevertheless contribute to the diversification of developing countries’ exports and increase their participation in global value chains. The increase in digitalization of companies due to the rapid introduction of new technologies (data analysis, cloud computing) has raised their importance as a factor in commercial transactions, affecting both new and traditional industries. Despite the advantages for companies, consumers and national economies arising from the ability of organizations to easily exchange data across borders, many countries at all stages of development have established barriers to cross-border data transfer. The most common concept of such restrictions has become data localization, the implementation of which is a significant burden on the growth of the Gross National Product. The digital mercantilism of countries considered in this article is a response to the challenge of increasing the country’s participation in the international division of labour in the digital economy. However, barriers for cross-border data transfer also delay and increase the cost of developing new and innovative products, undermine the ability of local multinational companies to use global platforms to facilitate collaboration between firms, universities and other research organizations and promote their own innovations. International practice has not yet developed a single, dominant approach in the context of regulating cross-border data flows, but addressing this issue requires a new format of multilateral regulation that has not been used for international trade in traditional goods and services.

1. Baldwin R. (2016), The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization, Harvard University Press, Boston.

2. Bauer M., Ferracane M.F. and Van der Marel E. (2016), “Tracing the Economic Impact of Regulations on the Free Flow of Data and Data Localization”, Centre for International Governance Innovation and Chatham House, Paper Series, no. 30, May.

3. Casalini F. and González J.L. (2019), “Trade and cross-border data flows”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, no. 220, OECD Publ., Paris.

4. Casalini F., González J.L. and Moïsé E. (2019), “Approaches to market openness in the digital age”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, no. 219, OECD Publ., Paris.

5. Castro D. (2013), “The false promise of data nationalism”, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Wash., DC, December.

6. Castro D., and McQuinn A. (2015), “Cross-border data flows enable growth in all industries”, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, February.

7. Cory N. (2017), “Cross-border data flows: Where are the barriers, and what do they cost?”, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Wash., DC.

8. Cory N. (2020), “Surveying the damage: Why we must accurately measure cross-borderd data flows and digital trade barriers”, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Wash., DC.

9. Ekimova K.V., Luk’yanov S.A. and Smirnov E.N. [Eds] (2019), Digital economy and artificial intelligence - new calls of the modern world economy: coll. monograph [Tsifrovaya ekonomika i iskusstvennyi intellekt – novye vyzovy sovremennoi mirovoi ekonomiki: koll. monografia], GUU, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].

10. Ezell S.J., Atkinson R.D. and Wein M.A. (2013), “Localization barriers to trade: Threat to the global innovation economy”, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Wash., DC, September.

11. Ferentina M. and Koten E.E. (2019), “Understanding supply chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”, Global Value Chain Development Report 2019, WTO, IDE-JETRO, OECD, UIBE, World Bank, pp. 103–119.

12. Luk’yanov S.A. (2006), “Determination of input barriers as the most important dynamic characteristic of the industry” [“Determinirovanie vhodnykh bar’erov kak vazhneishei dinamicheskoi kharakteristiki otrasli”], Journal of the Ural State University of Economics [Izvestiya Ural`skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta], no. 2 (14), pp. 33–39.

13. Manyika J., Lund S., Bughin J., Woetzel J., Stamenov K. and Dhingra D. (2016), Digital globalization: The new era of global flows, McKinsey Global Institute.

14. Meltzer J.P. (2019), “A WTO reform agenda. Data flows and international regulatory cooperation”, Global Economy & Development Working Paper 130, Wash., DC, September.

15. Miroudot S. and Cadestin C. (2017), “Services in global value chains: From inputs to value-creating activities”, OECD Trade Policy Paper 197.

16. Smirnov E.N. and Luk’yanov S.A. (2019), “Assessment of the transformative impact of global value chains on international trade” [“Otsenka transformiruyushchego vozdeistviya global’nykh tsepochek sozdaniya stoimosti na mezhdunarodnuyu torgovlyu”], The Manager [Upravlenets], vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 36–46.

17. Smirnov E.N. and Luk’yanov S.A. (2019), “Formation and development of the global market of systems and technologies of artificial intelligence”[“Formirovanie i razvitie globa’nogo rynka sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta”], Economy of Region [Ekonomika regiona], vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–69.

18. Smirnov E.N., Pas’ko A.V., Smagulova S.M. and Moga I.S. (2019), Strategies for the development of international management in the context of globalization, [Strategii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo menedzhmenta v usloviyakh globalizatsii], Logos, Stavropol, Russia. [In Russian].