Legal regulation and analysis of management effectiveness in the field of international investment cooperation in capital market in free economic zones of neighbouring countries

   This article is a comprehensive study of international investment cooperation and concept of the effectiveness of innovation in free economic zones (hereinafter referred to as FEZ) and their role in the modern world. The FEZ represent new centres of competence in various socio-economic and industrial spheres, contributing to the development of the international investment coope ration. In modern market conditions, they can become a catalyst for structural transformation, stimulation of innovation, attraction of capital investment, and technology exchange. Thus, in the context of global economic transformation and increased competition for technological leadership, the FEZ are becoming a key tool for stimulating innovation and attracting investment. Financial activity, being a key area of the economy, not only ensures the stability and sustainability of business entities, but also acts as a driver of innovations that are critically important for increasing competitiveness, optimising resource management, and adapting to global challenges, such as digitalisation and sanctions pressure. The analysis of legal models of the FEZ in the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States demonstrates their multidirectionality. In the Russian Federation, for example, the emphasis is on industrial production zones, where benefits are linked to the localisation of production. In contrast, China is dominated by innovation and technology clusters, offering research and design grants and simplified staff migration.

1. Avdjiev S., McGuire P., von Peter G. International dimensions of EME corporate debt. BIS Quarterly Review. 2020.

2. Balcilar M., Usman O., Gungor H., Roubaud D., Wohar M.E. Role of global, regional, and advanced market economic policy uncertainty on bond spreads in emerging markets. Economic Modelling. 2021;102. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105576

3. Chang L., Taghizadeh-Hesary F., Chen H., Mohsin M. Do green bonds have environmental benefits? Energy Economics. 2022;115. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106356

4. Demirer R., Ferrer R., Shahzad S.J.H. Oil price shocks, global financial markets and their connectedness. Energy Economics. 2020;88. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3394320.

5. Fajardo J., Mendes L. On the propensity to issue contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds. Quantitative Finance. 2020;4(20):691–707.

6. Ferriani F. From taper tantrum to COVID-19: portfolio flows to emerging markets in periods of stress. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2021;74. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101391.

7. Guang‐Wen Z., Murshed M., Siddik A.B., Alam M.S., Balsalobre‐Lorente D., Mahmood H. Achieving the objectives of the 2030 sustainable development goals agenda: causalities between economic growth, environmental sustainability, financial development, and renewable energy consumption. Sustainable Development. 2023;2(31):680–697.

8. Iqbal B.A. BRICS as a driver of global economic growth and development. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies. 2021;1(14):7–8. doi: 10.1177/09749101211067096

9. Jian J., Fan X., Zhao Sh. The green incentives and green bonds financing under the belt and road initiative. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2022;5(58):1430–1440. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2021.1887726

10. Kenourgios D., Umar Z., Lemonidi P. On the effect of credit rating announcements on sovereign bonds: international evidence. International Economics. 2020;163:58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco.2020.04.006

11. Kim S., Shin H.S. Offshore EME bond issuance and the transmission channels of global liquidity. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2021;112. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102336

12. Mikhaylov A. Understanding the risks associated with wallets, depository services, trading, lending, and borrowing in the crypto space. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2023;3(7). doi: 10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2223

13. Mikhaylov A., Yousif N.B.A., Dincer H., Yüksel S., Karpyn Z. Analysis of the knowledge and innovation-based customer expectations for the green crypto assets in investment strategies using artificial intelligence and facial expression-based fuzzy modelling. Quality and Quantity. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11135-025-02098-7

14. Mutalimov V., Kovaleva I., Mikhaylov A., Stepanova D. Assessing regional growth of small business in Russia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 2021;3(9):119–133. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2021.090308

15. Osmolovskaya A.S. Export of IT goods and services of the Republic of Belarus: problems and prospects. In: Collection of scientific articles of students, undergraduates, and postgraduates. Issue 33. Minsk: Four Quarters; 2025. Pp. 136–139. (In Russian).

16. Otek N.U.Y., Yan Ch., Nasiri A., Mboungam A.H.M. Green bonds issuance: insights in low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 2021;6. https://jcsr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40991-020-00056-0

17. Samitas A., Kampouris E., Umar Z. Financial contagion in real economy: the key role of policy uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2022;2(27):1633–1682. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2235

18. Umar Z., Yousaf I., Aharon D.Ye. The relationship between yield curve components and equity sectorial indices: evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2021;68. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101591

19. Wu Yu. Are green bonds priced lower than their conventional peers? Emerging Markets Review. 2022;52. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100909

20. Zhang X., Wang Z. Marketization vs market chase: insights from implicit government guarantees. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2020;69:435–455. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.021

21. Zverkov V.I., Kozlovsky A.N., Shpilenko A.V. (eds.) Special economic zones of Russia. Business navigator. 2021. Moscow: Association of clusters, technology parks and SEZ of Russia; 2021. 241 p. (In Russian).