Reflection of documents in the digital twin of the company and calculation of their impact on human behavior in the simulation model

The formation and formation of the Industry 4.0 concept stimulated the discussion of the use of computer technology in various areas of economic activity and, in particular, in the automation of social systems management. The basis of the concept is the inclusion of a virtual image of the social system in the form of a mathematical model or a digital twin of the enterprise in the production and management system. At the same time, it should be noted that today digital twin are created mainly only for technical objects used in the activities of enterprises. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the possibility of fixing organizational documents as one of the system-forming factors in the digital twin of an enterprise. This circumstance makes it possible, firstly, to more accurately calculate the managerial effects of managers by taking into account the impact of organizational documents on the activities of employees of the enterprise; secondly, to identify conflicts of documents developed by various departments of the company; thirdly, to calculate the content of documents during their development (design), based on the requirements of the situation or a given control effect. This possibility arises due to the use of a comprehensive mathematical model of the social system operating in an active environment. The model is a simulation agent-based model and allows you to calculate the dynamics of the social system in the socio-economic space, which allows its use in decision support systems by managers of any scale and activities to calculate the expected effect of management decisions – the specifics of a particular social system are taken into account by combining the values of the phase variables describing the state of the enterprise. The novelty of the research paper lies in the fact that it shows: the possibility to calculate the influence of organizational documents on the behavior of participants and, consequently, on the result of the social system, as well as the mechanism for converting messages, which are invariants of socio-economic space into information that affects the behavior of participants of relations.

1. Andieva E.Yu. and Mikhailov V.A. (2018), “Digital transformation of integrated management systems of an oil refining enterprise production activity”, Automation, Telemechanization and Communication in Oil Industry, no. 10, pp. 26–35. (In Russian).

2. Bagrin P.P. (2016), The possibility of simulation of corporate systems, Theoretical and Applied Economics, no. 1. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/etc/article_17763.html (accessed 12.06.2021). (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8647.2016.1.17763

3. Boschert S. and Rosen R. (2016), Digital twin – the simulation aspect, Mechatronic Futures, Ed. by P. Hehenberger, D. Bradley, pp. 59–74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5

4. Burkov V.N. and Burkova I.V. (2018), “Smart mechanisms and the digital economy”, Mathematical Modeling and Information Technologies in Engineering and Business Applications: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Voronezh, September 3–6, 2018, Ed. by M.G. Matveev, D.N. Borisov, Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia, pp. 3–9. (In Russian).

5. Burkov V.N., Zalozhnev A.Yu. and Novikov D.A. (2001), “Computational complexity of active systems management problems”, Proceedings of the International Conference “RASO’ 2001”, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, pp. 81–102. (In Russian).

6. Epstein J.M. (2007), Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J, USA.

7. Grieves M. (2014), Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication: white paper, 7 p.

8. Jiang C., Ma Y., Zheng Y., Gao S., Cheng S. and Chen H. (2018), Cyber physics system: a review, Library Hi Tech, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2017-0256

9. Katalevsky D.Yu. (2013), Fundamentals of simulation modeling and system analysis in management, Delo, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

10. Lee J., Bagheri В. and Kao H.A. (2015), “A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems”, Manufacturing Letters, vol. 3, pp. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

11. Macal С.M., North M.J. (2005). “Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation” // Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Ed. by M.E. Kuhl, N.M. Steiger, J.A. Joines, pp. 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234

12. Samosudov M.V. (2016), The theory of corporate interaction and the sustainability of corporate systems, GUU, Moscow, Russia. Available at: http://iom.guu.ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2019/05/2_Корп-взаимодействие_UCHPOS_2016-10-15.pdf (accessed 10.06.2021). (In Russian).

13. Samosudov M.V. (2019), “The model of the incoming resource flow of the social system for digitalization of management”, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, vol. 11, no. 08-Special Issue, pp. 2892–2900. Available at: http://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=3053 (accessed 12.06.2021).

14. Samosudov M.V. (2021a), “Formalization of impact of information on the human behaviour for automatization of calculation of the marketing influence”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 4849–4854.

15. Samosudov M.V. (2021b), Formal characterization of the impact of the institutional environment in the digital twin of the enterprise, Socio-Economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 314, Ed. by E.G. Popkova, V.N. Ostrovskaya, A.V. Bogoviz. Cham, Springer, pp. 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_95

16. Simonov P.V. (1997), “Neurobiology of individuality”, Priroda, no. 3, pp. 81–89. (In Russian).

17. Söderberg R., Wärmefjord K., Lindkvist L. and Carlson J.S. (2017), “Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production”, CIRP Annals, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038

18. Sowe S.K., Zettsu K., Simmon E., de Vaulx F. and Bojanova I. (2016), “Cyber-physical human systems: Putting people in the loop”, IT Professional, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.14

19. Uhlemann T.H.-J., Schock C., Lehmann C., Freiberger S. and Steinhilper R. (2017), “The digital twin: demonstrating the potential of real time data acquisition in production systems”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 9, pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.043

20. Uhlemann T.H.-J., Steinhilper R. and Lehmann Ch. (2017), “The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for Industry 4.0”, Procedia CIRP, Ed. by S. Takata, Y. Umeda, S. Kondoh, vol. 61, pp. 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152