<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">emanag</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">E-Management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>E-Management</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658-3445</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-8407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>State University of Management</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26425/2658-3445-2023-6-2-4-13</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">emanag-369</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ В ОТРАСЛЯХ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ELECTRONIC MANAGEMENT IN VARIOUS FIELDS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Модель оценки цифровой зрелости для промышленных предприятий строительной индустрии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Maturity model for assessing digitalization process of construction industry companies</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-9255</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Булина</surname><given-names>А. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bulina</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Булина Анна Романовна - аспирант</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anna R. Bulina - Postgraduate Student</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mochalova.anna@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-4321</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Солопова</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Solopova</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Солопова Наталья Анатольевна - д-р экон. наук, проф. каф. менеджмента и инноваций</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Natalia A. Solopova - Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. at the Management and Innovations Department</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ushanovan@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский Московский государственный строительный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Булина А.Р., Солопова Н.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Булина А.Р., Солопова Н.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bulina A.R., Solopova N.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://e-management.guu.ru/jour/article/view/369">https://e-management.guu.ru/jour/article/view/369</self-uri><abstract><p>Строительная индустрия находится на пороге масштабных изменений: Индустрия 4.0 готовит промышленным предприятиям серьезные вызовы. Цифровая трансформация может повлечь значительные изменения во всех сферах деятельности предприятий. Для оценки текущего состояния и измерения цифровой зрелости организации, как правило, используются модели зрелости. В статье предложена авторская четырехэтапная модель оценки цифровой зрелости для промышленных предприятий строительной индустрии. При разработке модели было принято решение уйти от общих оценок и в качестве инструмента оценивания использовать конкретные изменения, которые будут происходить на промышленных предприятиях строительной индустрии в процессе цифровой трансформации: модель содержит пятнадцать факторов оценки, изменения которых на различных этапах являются индикаторами цифровой зрелости. Предложенная модель содержит подробное описание четырех этапов цифровой зрелости, поэтому может служить не только для оценки цифровой зрелости промышленных предприятий строительной индустрии, но и для обозначения целей, планируемых к достижению в будущем в рамках цифровой трансформации, в стратегиях или бизнес-моделях предприятий. Отличительной особенностью модели является наличие факторов оценки, отражающих степень интеграции цифровой среды промышленных предприятий с BIM-моделями строительных организаций.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The construction industry is on the verge of large–scale changes as Industry 4.0 is preparing industrial enterprises for serious challenges. Digital transformation can bring significant changes in all areas of enterprise activity. Maturity models are usually used to assess the current situation and measure the digital maturity of an organization. The authors’ four-stage model of digital maturity assessment for construction industry companies has been proposed. When developing the model, it had been decided to move away from general assessments and use specific changes that would occur at construction industry companies in the process of digital transformation as an assessment tool. The model contains fifteen assessment factors, changes of which at various stages are indicators of digital maturity. The proposed model contains a detailed description of the four stages of digital maturity, therefore it can serve not only to assess the digital maturity of industrial enterprises in the construction industry, but can also be used to indicate the goals planned to be achieved in the future as part of digital transformation, in strategies or business models of enterprises. A distinctive feature of the model is evaluation factors reflecting the degree of integration of the digital environment of industrial enterprises with BIM models of construction organizations.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>модель зрелости</kwd><kwd>оценка зрелости</kwd><kwd>цифровая зрелость</kwd><kwd>цифровая трансформация</kwd><kwd>промышленные предприятия</kwd><kwd>строительная индустрия</kwd><kwd>цифровые технологии</kwd><kwd>цифровая экономика</kwd><kwd>Индустрия 4.0</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>maturity model</kwd><kwd>maturity assessment</kwd><kwd>digital maturity</kwd><kwd>digital transformation</kwd><kwd>industrial enterprises</kwd><kwd>construction industry</kwd><kwd>digital technologies</kwd><kwd>digital economy</kwd><kwd>Industry 4.0</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гилева Т.А. (2019). Цифровая зрелость предприятия: методы оценки и управления // Вестник УГНТУ. Наука, образование, экономика. Серия: Экономика. № 1(27). С. 38–52. DOI https://doi.org/10.17122/2541-8904-2019-1-27-38-52</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson E. (2017), “Empire of Cotton: A Global History”, In: Ethnobiology Letters, Vintage, NY, pp. 97–100, DOI https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.1068</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьмин П.С. (2021). Цифровизация промышленности: эмпирическая оценка цифровой зрелости предприятий // Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент. № 12(3). С. 220–235. DOI https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-3-220-23</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erol S., Schumacher A. and Sihn W. (2016), “Strategic guidance towards Industry 4.0 – a three-stage process model”, Proc. of International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing, January 27–29, 2016, Stellenbosch, South Africa.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мерзлов И.Ю. (2022). Методы оценки цифровой зрелости: обзор международной практики // Креативная экономика. Т. 16, № 2. С. 503–520. DOI https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.2.114163.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ganzarain J., Errasti N. (2016), “Three Stage Maturity Model in SME’s toward Industry 4.0”, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1119–1128, DOI https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л., Черепанов В.В. (2021). Уровни цифровой зрелости промышленного предприятия // Journal of new economy. № 2. С. 88–109. DOI https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-2-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gileva T.A. (2019), “Digital maturity of the enterprise: methods of assessment and management”, Вulletin USPTU, no. 1(27), pp. 38–52 (in Russian), DOI https://doi.org/10.17122/2541-8904-2019-1-27-38-52</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson E. (2017). Empire of Cotton: A Global History // Ethnobiology Letters. Vintage. NY: Vintage. 615 p. Pp. 97–100. DOI https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.1068</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gökalp E., Şener U. and Eren P.E. (2017), “Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM”, International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, September 9, 2017, Springer, Cham, pp. 128–142, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Erol S., Schumacher A., Sihn W. (2016). Strategic guidance towards Industry 4.0 – a three-stage process model // Proc. of International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing, January 27–29, 2016 / Stellenbosch, South Africa.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuzmin P.S. (2021), “Industrial digitalization: Аn empirical assessment of the digital maturity of enterprises”, Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, no. 12(3), pp. 220–235 (in Russian), DOI https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-3-220-23</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ganzarain, J., Errasti, N. (2016). Three Stage Maturity Model in SME’s toward Industry 4.0 // Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. Vol. 9, no. 5. Pp. 1119–1128. DOI https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merzlov I.Yu. (2022), “Methods for assessing digital maturity: an overview of international practice” Journal of Creative Economy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 503–520 (in Russian), DOI https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.2.114163</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gökalp E., Şener U., Eren P.E. (2017). Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM // International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, September 9, 2017 / Springer, Cham. Pp. 128–142. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V., Simonova V.L. and Cherepanov V.V. (2021), “Digital maturity levels of an industrial enterprise”, Journal of new economy, no. 2, pp. 88–109 (in Russian), DOI https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-2-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scremin L., Armellini F., Brun A., Solar-Pelletier L., Beaudry C. (2018). Towards a Framework for Assessing the Maturity of Manufacturing Companies in Industry 4.0 Adoption // Research Anthology on Cross-Industry Challenges of Industry 4.0. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 2004 p. Pp. 895–925. DOI https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8548-1.ch045</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scremin L., Armellini F., Brun, A., Solar-Pelletier L. and Beaudry C. (2018), “Towards a Framework for Assessing the Maturity of Manufacturing Companies in Industry 4.0 Adoption”, In: Research Anthology on Cross-Industry Challenges of Industry 4.0, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 895–925, DOI https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8548-1.ch045</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schuh G., Potente T., Varandani R., Schmitz T. (2014). Global Footprint Design based on genetic algorithms – An ‘Industry 4.0’ perspective” // CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technology. Vol. 63, no. 1. Pp. 433–436.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schuh G., Potente T., Varandani R. and Schmitz T. (2014), “Global Footprint Design based on genetic algorithms – An ‘Industry 4.0’ perspective”, CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 433–436.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumacher A., Erol S., Sihn W. (2016). A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises // Procedia CIRP. Vol. 52. Pp. 161–166. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumacher A., Erol S. and Sihn W. (2016), “A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 52, pp. 161–166, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
